The administration of an estate following someone’s death can be a complex and emotionally fraught process, particularly when disagreements arise over the contents of a will. In cases where individuals believe that a will does not accurately reflect the deceased’s wishes, they may choose to contest it. This legal action can prolong the probate process, create familial strains, and potentially alter the distribution of assets. It is essential for both executors and potential claimants to understand the steps and implications involved in challenging a will.
Before any legal action is undertaken, it’s vital to determine whether there are valid reasons to dispute a will. English law stipulates specific grounds under which a will may be challenged. The most common of these include lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, lack of valid execution, fraud or forgery, and lack of knowledge and approval.
Lack of testamentary capacity refers to situations where the testator (the person making the will) did not possess the mental ability to understand what they were doing at the time of making the will. This encompasses an understanding of the nature and effect of making the will, the extent of their estate, and those who might reasonably be expected to benefit.
Undue influence arises when the testator was coerced or manipulated into writing the will in a certain way. It is notoriously difficult to prove, requiring evidence of pressure that overpowered the testator’s own free will.
Issues regarding lack of valid execution involve the formalities as set out in the Wills Act 1837. A will must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed by two independent witnesses in the testator’s presence.
Fraud or forgery can consist of tampering with a will or creating a completely fake document purporting to be the testator’s true will.
A claim of lack of knowledge and approval can be made when there is reason to believe the testator did not understand or did not agree with the contents of the will.
For any of these claims, early consultation with a solicitor experienced in contentious probate can clarify potential routes and their likelihood of success.
Not everyone is entitled to contest a will. Under English law, only those who have a financial interest in the estate or would have been entitled to a portion under intestacy rules can lodge an objection. This typically includes spouses or civil partners, children, cohabiting partners, other relatives, or individuals who were financially dependent on the deceased.
In determining legal standing, it is essential to consider the implications of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. This statute allows for certain individuals to claim reasonable financial provision from an estate, even if they are not included in the will. Claims under this Act are distinct from will validity contests and have their own procedures and timeframes.
Timeliness is critical when considering whether to contest a will. Different types of claims have varied limitation periods. For example, claims under the Inheritance Act must be brought within six months of the grant of probate. Fraudulent claims, however, may not be subject to strict limitation periods, though waiting too long could still adversely impact a case.
Ideally, potential claimants should act as soon as possible, preferably before probate is granted. This allows for the possibility to enter a caveat with the Probate Registry — a legal mechanism that prevents a grant of probate from being issued and gives the claimant time to investigate their case further. A caveat lasts for six months but can be renewed. However, it is not suitable for all types of claims (for example, it cannot be used for Inheritance Act claims).
Once preliminary considerations have been addressed, seeking professional legal advice is highly advisable. Disputing a will is complex and emotionally charged, meaning objective guidance is invaluable. A solicitor specialising in contentious probate can assist in identifying the relevant grounds for challenge, advising on prospects of success, and outlining possible outcomes, whether through negotiation or litigation.
Concurrent with this legal counsel, early efforts should be made to collect evidence. This may include medical records, statements from witnesses (especially those present when the will was signed), the testator’s historical correspondence, and expert opinions in cases involving questions of mental capacity or signature authenticity. The stronger and more concrete the available evidence, the greater the likelihood that a claim will succeed or lead to a favourable settlement.
Traditional court litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and emotionally draining. For these reasons, many solicitors will advise clients to consider mediation or other ADR methods before initiating formal legal proceedings.
Mediation provides a structured yet informal environment where parties, guided by a neutral third-party mediator, can explore possible resolutions. This option is particularly suitable for inheritance disputes, where preserving family relationships is often desirable. The majority of contested will cases in the UK are resolved through settlement or mediation, resulting in tailored solutions that court rulings might not be able to offer.
Engaging in mediation does not compromise one’s ability to proceed to court if negotiations fail. On the contrary, the willingness to pursue ADR demonstrates reasonableness — a factor courts appreciate during subsequent litigation.
If alternative dispute resolution is unsuccessful or deemed inappropriate due to the stakes involved or an uncooperative opposing party, then formal legal action may become inevitable.
The process typically begins with the issuance of a legal claim form to the Probate Court, which sets out the basis for the challenge. For example, a claim might assert that a will is invalid due to undue influence and request that an earlier will be recognised instead.
Court procedures follow a set protocol, including the filing of statements of case, the exchange of evidence, and potentially a trial. Costs can be substantial, and although costs often follow the outcome (i.e., the losing party pays), the court retains discretion. In some cases, where the dispute over a will was reasonable, parties may be ordered to bear their own costs.
Contesting a will has a direct and immediate impact on the administration of the estate. The executor named in the disputed will must tread carefully during the period of contestation. They may be limited in their capacity to distribute assets until the dispute is resolved.
In some situations, a neutral administrator (known as an administrator pendente lite) may be appointed by the court to manage the estate while litigation is ongoing. This helps preserve the estate’s value and ensures impartial handling of affairs.
For executors, receiving notice of a potential will contest requires careful handling. While their primary role is to honour the wishes of the deceased, they must also act prudently to shield the estate from unnecessary loss or legal exposure.
Before pursuing a challenge, potential claimants should carefully assess the broader costs – not just legal fees, but also the emotional burden and long-term family consequences. Contested wills often pit close relatives against one another. The emotional toll can be significant, and relationships may be permanently damaged.
From a financial perspective, costs can spiral if the case becomes contentious and prolonged. While legal aid is not available for most will disputes, some firms may offer conditional fee agreements (commonly called “no win, no fee”). This can reduce the personal financial risk for claimants, though fees upon success can be substantial. Litigation insurance is another option worth exploring.
Notably, courts approach will disputes with great care. There is a presumption that a will, once formally executed, reflects the testator’s wishes. This means the burden of proof rests with those challenging it. As such, claims must be robustly constructed. Scenarios that may support a challenge include sudden changes in the will shortly before death, unusual provisions that contradict prior promises or the natural order of inheritance, the involvement of a beneficiary in preparing or witnessing the will, and evidence suggesting deteriorating mental or physical health.
Conversely, a failed claim can have wider ramifications. Aside from legal costs, if the court deems the action frivolous or motivated by spite, the claimant could face adverse cost orders or reputational harm within family circles.
While will disputes can’t always be avoided, steps taken while the testator is alive can significantly reduce the risk. Proper legal advice, clear and regularly updated documentation, and communication with family or beneficiaries help minimise ambiguity and suspicion. Recording evidence of mental capacity at the time of drafting a will, especially in sensitive cases, can further prevent challenges down the line.
Professionally drafted wills are also much less likely to fail under legal scrutiny. Ambiguous language, failure to follow proper execution formalities, and handwritten amendments often open the door to challenges. Solicitors are trained to mitigate these risks while ensuring that testamentary wishes are expressed clearly and legally.
The decision to dispute a will is a serious one that should not be taken lightly. It involves an in-depth understanding of legal grounds, strong evidence, and a mindful consideration of both financial and emotional implications. Whether you are an estate executor facing a contested will, or a potential claimant considering legal action, seeking early legal advice is paramount.
Navigating the tensions of these disputes with professionalism and compassion can help parties find resolutions that respect the legacy of the deceased while addressing legitimate concerns. Through timely action, thoughtful legal strategy, and a willingness to engage in dialogue, it is possible to resolve many of these difficult matters without prolonging grief or damaging family relationships irreparably.
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
COPYRIGHT © 2024 MY WILL AND PROBATE
