Divorce is a significant life event that involves the disentangling of emotional, personal, and financial relationships. Among the myriad of financial considerations, family trusts can present complex challenges. When a couple decides to separate, determining how assets held in trust factor into the division of property and financial settlements becomes a pivotal issue. This complexity is further magnified when trusts have been established to benefit children, to protect generational wealth, or to address specific financial planning goals.
When it comes to marital breakdown, the presence of a family trust may have profound implications, regardless of whether the trust was created before or during the marriage. Proper handling of such structures in divorce proceedings requires a meticulous approach, involving legal, tax, and financial perspectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the key issues related to incorporating trusts into divorce planning, outlining best practices, legal considerations, and strategic steps for navigating this intricate area.
Family trusts are legal arrangements wherein assets are transferred to a trustee, who holds and manages them on behalf of specified beneficiaries. These trusts can be discretionary, allowing the trustee wide-ranging powers in deciding how and when to distribute income or capital, or they can be fixed interest, where each beneficiary has a defined share of the trust.
The primary appeal of family trusts lies in their ability to protect assets, provide for future generations, and manage wealth in a controlled manner. In a well-structured trust, neither the settlor nor the beneficiaries have full control over the trust assets. While this can provide protection against third-party claims—including those stemming from divorce—it does not make the trust automatically immune to scrutiny by the courts.
Understanding the intention behind a trust, the degree of control the parties to the divorce hold over it, and how it has been used in the context of the family’s wealth are all crucial in determining how it should be treated in divorce proceedings.
In England and Wales, the Family Court has wide discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to redistribute financial assets upon divorce. The court’s primary concern is to ensure a fair outcome that meets the needs of both parties, especially when children are involved.
A key issue is whether the trust in question is considered a financial resource available to either spouse. Courts may look beyond the formal legal structure of the trust to determine if one party has de facto control or if there has been a regular pattern of benefit that would suggest the trust constitutes a financial resource. This concept is known as the ‘nuptial settlement’ doctrine—if the court deems a trust to be a nuptial settlement, it can potentially vary it to transfer assets or income to the other spouse.
Case law surrounding this area is complex. One benchmark decision is the case of Charman v Charman (2007), in which the Court of Appeal confirmed that a trust could be considered part of the matrimonial assets subject to distribution if the settlor or a party to the divorce has beneficial access or control. Similarly, in the case of Thomas v Thomas (1995), the court highlighted that assets held in trust do not automatically escape the court’s reach, especially if the lifestyle of the parties has consistently been supported by those assets.
The specific structure and terms of a trust greatly influence how it will be treated in divorce proceedings. Critical aspects include:
– The identity and roles of the settlor, trustees, and beneficiaries
– The degree of discretion conferred upon trustees
– The history of distributions made from the trust
– The source of the trust assets
– The purpose for which the trust was established
Trusts erected purely for tax efficiency or asset protection reasons, especially when contributed to by one or both spouses during the course of the marriage, are more likely to be scrutinised. In contrast, trusts independently managed and established long before the marriage, typically by previous generations, may have a stronger claim to exclusion from the marital pot. However, even in those scenarios, if the trust has been a consistent source of income or capital to one of the spouses, such benefits may still be considered in any financial settlement.
Sound estate planning involves forethought not just about taxes and inheritance but also about potential future family conflicts, including divorce. Those establishing trusts should consider how a divorce might affect the trust’s assets and the interest of beneficiaries.
Several strategies may help protect a trust from becoming entangled in divorce proceedings:
– Drafting the trust deed with clear, non-nuptial intent, including explicit language that the trust is not designed to benefit any marriage or marriage-like relationship
– Appointing independent trustees who act autonomously and not as agents of the settlor or beneficiaries
– Minimising evidence of pattern-based distributions that might imply regular personal income
– Avoiding naming spouses as direct beneficiaries, especially in discretionary trusts
– Including robust powers to exclude or remove beneficiaries who become a financial risk to the trust’s purpose
In some cases, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements can be employed to clarify that any interests in a particular family trust are separate property and should not be contested during divorce. While these agreements are not legally binding in the UK, recent jurisprudence has shown courts are increasingly willing to uphold them, assuming they are fair and entered into with full transparency and legal advice.
Courts are guided by the notion of fairness, rather than rigid formulas, in determining the financial settlement of divorcing couples. One of the pivotal questions is whether a trust amounts to a financial resource—if one party has historically benefited from the trust, or if trustees have shown a pattern of distributions based upon requests or perceived need, the court may take these as indicators that trust assets can be drawn upon in future.
It’s important to note that the court cannot directly award trust assets to the other spouse unless the trust is clearly deemed a nuptial settlement. However, it can ‘offset’ these assets by adjusting the distribution of other marital property, ensuring that the spouse with potential access to trust income or capital may receive less from joint wealth in exchange.
For example, if the husband stands to inherit or is a discretionary beneficiary of a substantial family trust, the court may grant a higher share of joint marital assets to the wife to compensate for the husband’s future financial advantages. The level of certainty regarding distribution from the trust plays a crucial role here.
An additional layer of complexity arises when the trust in question is administered or domiciled offshore. While English courts do have jurisdiction over divorces granted within England or Wales, enforcing decisions on foreign trustees or trust assets can prove difficult and, in some cases, impossible.
Offshore trusts are often used precisely because they offer added legal distance and asset protection. However, courts may still proceed to make rulings based on assumed benefits derived from those arrangements. In the case of Charalambous v Charalambous (2004), for example, the court accepted that although the husband did not legally own offshore trust assets, he derived substantial benefit from them and thus those should be factored into the financial award.
Working with international experts, including lawyers familiar with the jurisdiction in which the trust is held, becomes imperative in such cases. Additionally, the perceived transparency and conduct of the trustees (often provided by professional foreign trust companies) can significantly affect how the court approaches the matter.
Given the sensitive and technical nature of trusts, collaborative advisory teams are essential for effective divorce planning. Family lawyers, trusts and estates lawyers, accountants, and wealth managers must often work in tandem to delineate the assets, explain the trust’s function and history, and advise on its likely treatment in court.
For the individual benefiting from the trust, this process ensures that arguments for exclusion are robust and substantiated by evidence. For the other party, forensic accounting and thorough legal analysis can uncover indirect benefits and lead to a more equitable financial settlement.
Moreover, exploring alternative dispute resolution methods—such as mediation or collaborative law—can be beneficial in cases involving trusts. These methods allow for greater privacy, control over the proceedings, and the flexibility to create bespoke arrangements that may avoid the adversarial pitfalls of court litigation.
Trusts are subjected to high levels of scrutiny within divorce proceedings, particularly in regard to full and frank disclosure. Any omission or misrepresentation may lead to serious legal consequences. Both parties are under a legal obligation to disclose all interests, known or potential, in trust structures.
Trustees are not immune from being drawn into the proceedings and may be required to disclose documentation, account records, and even give testimony regarding their decisions and operations. Some trustees may attempt to limit involvement by citing confidentiality or jurisdictional limitations, but the court can infer adverse conclusions from a failure to cooperate.
Being forthright about any trust interests, while protecting legitimate privacy and family goals, is key to maintaining credibility before the court.
Even after a divorce has been finalised, family trusts may continue to play a role in managing wealth, supporting dependents, and maintaining family legacies. Where children from the marriage are beneficiaries, trustees should continue to act impartially and in accordance with the trust deed.
It may be beneficial to review or amend the structure of the trust, subject to its legal flexibility, to reflect post-divorce realities. For instance, former spouses may be removed as trustees or beneficiaries, succession plans may be updated, and distributions may be recalibrated to maintain fairness and integrity.
Professional trustees need to be particularly cautious about acting outside of their powers or taking sides in post-divorce conflicts, as doing so could expose them to legal claims and reputational damage.
Navigating the intersection of family trusts and divorce requires a careful, informed, and strategic approach. While trusts can offer robust asset protection and long-term financial planning benefits, they are not automatically shielded from scrutiny during marital breakdowns. Courts will examine the substance behind the structure, particularly if the trust has been used as a financial resource during the marriage.
For settlors, trustees, and beneficiaries alike, proactive planning, transparent documentation, and the support of multidisciplinary advisers are essential to ensure that trust arrangements are respected while fulfilling legal disclosure obligations and achieving a fair outcome.
As divorce cases involving trusts grow in complexity, clarity, collaboration, and foresight remain the best defences—ensuring that both personal wealth and family intentions are preserved as much as possible in the face of change.
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Disclaimer
COPYRIGHT © 2024 MY WILL AND PROBATE
